Duplicati vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDuplicatiRestic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITBSD-2-Clause
LanguageC#Go
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 14,864★ 35,412
First released20082015
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Duplicati if…

  • Friendly GUI
  • Broad storage support
  • Free
Duplicati details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Duplicati or Restic better?

Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community, while Duplicati is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Duplicati and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Duplicati and Restic with Docker?

Duplicati: yes. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons