Duplicati vs mail-archiver
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Duplicati
Free backup software with a friendly web UI
VS
mail-archiver
Web application for archiving, searching, and exporting emails from
| Feature | Duplicati | mail-archiver |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C# | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,864 | ★ 2,045 |
| First released | 2008 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | — |
Why pick each one
Choose mail-archiver if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in C#
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicati or mail-archiver better?
Duplicati is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider mail-archiver if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Duplicati and mail-archiver free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and mail-archiver under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicati and mail-archiver with Docker?
Duplicati: yes. mail-archiver: yes.