Duplicati vs Magic Wormhole

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDuplicatiMagic Wormhole
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageC#Python
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB32 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary
GitHub stars★ 14,864★ 22,792
First released20082016
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteWeTransfer, AirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose Duplicati if…

  • Friendly GUI
  • Broad storage support
  • Free
Duplicati details

Choose Magic Wormhole if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 22.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
Magic Wormhole details

Frequently asked questions

Is Duplicati or Magic Wormhole better?

Neither is universally better. Magic Wormhole has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Duplicati and Magic Wormhole free and open-source?

Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and Magic Wormhole under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Duplicati and Magic Wormhole with Docker?

Duplicati: yes. Magic Wormhole: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons