Dittofeed vs Postal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dittofeed
Omni-channel customer engagement and messaging automation platform
VS
Postal
Complete mail delivery platform for outgoing email
| Feature | Dittofeed | Postal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,888 | ★ 16,724 |
| First released | 2026 | 2017 |
| Replaces | — | SendGrid, Mailgun, Postmark |
Why pick each one
Choose Dittofeed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Dittofeed or Postal better?
Neither is universally better. Postal has the larger community, while Dittofeed is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Dittofeed and Postal free and open-source?
Yes. Dittofeed is licensed under MIT and Postal under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dittofeed and Postal with Docker?
Dittofeed: yes. Postal: yes.