Mail-in-a-Box vs Postal

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMail-in-a-BoxPostal
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseCC0-1.0MIT
LanguagePythonRuby
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, one-clickdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,385★ 16,724
First released20142017
ReplacesGoogle Workspace, Microsoft 365SendGrid, Mailgun, Postmark

Why pick each one

Choose Mail-in-a-Box if…

  • Very beginner-friendly
  • Opinionated, complete stack
Mail-in-a-Box details

Choose Postal if…

  • Great for application email
  • Strong API
Postal details

Frequently asked questions

Is Mail-in-a-Box or Postal better?

Neither is universally better. Postal has the larger community, while Mail-in-a-Box is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Mail-in-a-Box and Postal free and open-source?

Yes. Mail-in-a-Box is licensed under CC0-1.0 and Postal under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Mail-in-a-Box and Postal with Docker?

Mail-in-a-Box: check the project docs for container support. Postal: yes.

Related comparisons