Dittofeed vs listmonk
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dittofeed
Omni-channel customer engagement and messaging automation platform
VS
listmonk
Self-hosted newsletter and mailing list manager
| Feature | Dittofeed | listmonk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,888 | ★ 22,670 |
| First released | 2026 | 2020 |
| Replaces | — | Mailchimp, Sendinblue |
Why pick each one
Choose Dittofeed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Dittofeed or listmonk better?
listmonk is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Dittofeed if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Dittofeed and listmonk free and open-source?
Yes. Dittofeed is licensed under MIT and listmonk under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dittofeed and listmonk with Docker?
Dittofeed: yes. listmonk: yes.