Dino vs Mattermost
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Dino | Mattermost |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Team Chat |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Vala | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,472 | ★ 38,708 |
| First released | 2017 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Skype, Slack | Slack, Microsoft Teams |
Why pick each one
Choose Dino if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Vala
Choose Mattermost if…
- Great for technical teams
- Strong security posture
- Good integrations
Frequently asked questions
Is Dino or Mattermost better?
Neither is universally better. Mattermost has the larger community, while Dino is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Dino and Mattermost free and open-source?
Yes. Dino is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mattermost under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dino and Mattermost with Docker?
Dino: check the project docs for container support. Mattermost: yes.