Conduit vs Mattermost
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Conduit
Simple, fast and reliable Matrix homeserver in Rust
VS
Mattermost
Secure collaboration for developer teams
| Feature | Conduit | Mattermost |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Team Chat |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, bare-metal, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,200 | ★ 38,708 |
| First released | 2020 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | Slack, Microsoft Teams |
Why pick each one
Choose Mattermost if…
- Great for technical teams
- Strong security posture
- Good integrations
Frequently asked questions
Is Conduit or Mattermost better?
Neither is universally better. Mattermost has the larger community, while Conduit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Conduit and Mattermost free and open-source?
Yes. Conduit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Mattermost under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Conduit and Mattermost with Docker?
Conduit: yes. Mattermost: yes.