Sliding Sync Proxy vs Dino
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Sliding Sync Proxy
Standalone sync proxy enabling fast Matrix clients
VS
Dino
Modern XMPP chat client for the desktop
| Feature | Sliding Sync Proxy | Dino |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Vala |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 282 | ★ 2,472 |
| First released | 2022 | 2017 |
| Replaces | — | Skype, Slack |
Why pick each one
Choose Sliding Sync Proxy if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Dino if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Vala
Frequently asked questions
Is Sliding Sync Proxy or Dino better?
Dino is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Sliding Sync Proxy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Sliding Sync Proxy and Dino free and open-source?
Yes. Sliding Sync Proxy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Dino under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Sliding Sync Proxy and Dino with Docker?
Sliding Sync Proxy: yes. Dino: check the project docs for container support.