Diacamma vs Super Productivity

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDiacammaSuper Productivity
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseGPL-3.0-or-laterMIT
LanguageTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM50 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 21,181
First released20232018
ReplacesAssoConnect, Ciel Associations, HelloAssoTodoist, Things

Why pick each one

Choose Diacamma if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Diacamma details

Choose Super Productivity if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 21.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Super Productivity details

Frequently asked questions

Is Diacamma or Super Productivity better?

Super Productivity is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Diacamma if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Diacamma and Super Productivity free and open-source?

Yes. Diacamma is licensed under GPL-3.0-or-later and Super Productivity under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Diacamma and Super Productivity with Docker?

Diacamma: check the project docs for container support. Super Productivity: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons