Dendron vs Wikmd
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dendron
Hierarchical note-taking and personal knowledge wiki
VS
Wikmd
File-based wiki using Markdown and Git
| Feature | Dendron | Wikmd |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,458 | ★ 424 |
| First released | 2020 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Notion, Confluence | Confluence, Notion |
Why pick each one
Choose Dendron if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 7.5k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Dendron or Wikmd better?
Neither is universally better. Dendron has the larger community, while Wikmd is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Dendron and Wikmd free and open-source?
Yes. Dendron is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Wikmd under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dendron and Wikmd with Docker?
Dendron: check the project docs for container support. Wikmd: yes.