DDNS-Go vs Shadowsocks-libev

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDDNS-GoShadowsocks-libev
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageGoC
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB32 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal, source, docker
GitHub stars★ 17,177★ 16,181
First released20202014
ReplacesNo-IP, DynDNScommercial VPN proxies

Why pick each one

Choose DDNS-Go if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 17.2k GitHub stars
DDNS-Go details

Choose Shadowsocks-libev if…

  • Very efficient
  • Good for constrained devices
Shadowsocks-libev details

Frequently asked questions

Is DDNS-Go or Shadowsocks-libev better?

DDNS-Go is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Shadowsocks-libev if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are DDNS-Go and Shadowsocks-libev free and open-source?

Yes. DDNS-Go is licensed under MIT and Shadowsocks-libev under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run DDNS-Go and Shadowsocks-libev with Docker?

DDNS-Go: yes. Shadowsocks-libev: yes.

Related comparisons