SHSelfHostIndex

DDNS-Go vs OAuth2 Proxy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
DD DDNS-Go Automatic dynamic DNS updater with a web interface VS OA OAuth2 Proxy Reverse proxy that adds authentication to any web app
FeatureDDNS-GoOAuth2 Proxy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 17,177★ 14,808
First released20202015
ReplacesNo-IP, DynDNSCloudflare Access

Why pick each one

Choose DDNS-Go if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 17.2k GitHub stars
DDNS-Go details

Choose OAuth2 Proxy if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 14.8k GitHub stars
OAuth2 Proxy details

Frequently asked questions

Is DDNS-Go or OAuth2 Proxy better?

DDNS-Go is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OAuth2 Proxy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are DDNS-Go and OAuth2 Proxy free and open-source?

Yes. DDNS-Go is licensed under MIT and OAuth2 Proxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run DDNS-Go and OAuth2 Proxy with Docker?

DDNS-Go: yes. OAuth2 Proxy: yes.

Related comparisons