Cup vs Novu

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCupNovu
CategoryAutomation & WorkflowsAutomation & Workflows
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageRustTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 1,337★ 39,466
First released20242021
ReplacesWatchtowerCourier, Knock

Why pick each one

Choose Cup if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
Cup details

Choose Novu if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
Novu details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cup or Novu better?

Neither is universally better. Novu has the larger community, while Cup is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Cup and Novu free and open-source?

Yes. Cup is licensed under MIT and Novu under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cup and Novu with Docker?

Cup: yes. Novu: yes.

Related comparisons