CryFS vs File Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCryFSFile Browser
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseLGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,297★ 35,800
First released20152017
ReplacesBoxcryptorDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose CryFS if…

  • Strong metadata protection
  • Pairs with any sync tool
CryFS details

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is CryFS or File Browser better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CryFS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are CryFS and File Browser free and open-source?

Yes. CryFS is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and File Browser under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CryFS and File Browser with Docker?

CryFS: check the project docs for container support. File Browser: yes.

Related comparisons