Cryptomator CLI vs File Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCryptomator CLIFile Browser
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageJavaGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 420★ 35,800
First released20172017
ReplacesBoxcryptorDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Cryptomator CLI if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Java
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Cryptomator CLI details

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cryptomator CLI or File Browser better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Cryptomator CLI if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Cryptomator CLI and File Browser free and open-source?

Yes. Cryptomator CLI is licensed under GPL-3.0 and File Browser under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cryptomator CLI and File Browser with Docker?

Cryptomator CLI: yes. File Browser: yes.

Related comparisons