CryFS vs LocalSend

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCryFSLocalSend
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseLGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageRustDart
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 2,297★ 87,025
First released20152022
ReplacesBoxcryptorAirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose CryFS if…

  • Strong metadata protection
  • Pairs with any sync tool
CryFS details

Choose LocalSend if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 87k GitHub stars
  • Written in Dart
LocalSend details

Frequently asked questions

Is CryFS or LocalSend better?

LocalSend is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CryFS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are CryFS and LocalSend free and open-source?

Yes. CryFS is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and LocalSend under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CryFS and LocalSend with Docker?

CryFS: check the project docs for container support. LocalSend: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons