CrowdSec vs DDNS-Go

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCrowdSecDDNS-Go
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 14,461★ 17,177
First released20202020
ReplacesCloudflare WAF, Fail2banNo-IP, DynDNS

Why pick each one

Choose CrowdSec if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 14.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
CrowdSec details

Choose DDNS-Go if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 17.2k GitHub stars
DDNS-Go details

Frequently asked questions

Is CrowdSec or DDNS-Go better?

DDNS-Go is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CrowdSec if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are CrowdSec and DDNS-Go free and open-source?

Yes. CrowdSec is licensed under MIT and DDNS-Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CrowdSec and DDNS-Go with Docker?

CrowdSec: yes. DDNS-Go: yes.

Related comparisons