Cowyo vs Tina CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cowyo
Feature-rich wiki webserver for minimalists
VS
Tina CMS
Git-backed content management with visual editing
| Feature | Cowyo | Tina CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 968 | ★ 13,714 |
| First released | 2023 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | Contentful, Sanity |
Why pick each one
Choose Cowyo if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose Tina CMS if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 13.7k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Cowyo or Tina CMS better?
Neither is universally better. Tina CMS has the larger community, while Cowyo is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cowyo and Tina CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Cowyo is licensed under MIT and Tina CMS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cowyo and Tina CMS with Docker?
Cowyo: check the project docs for container support. Tina CMS: yes.