Cowyo vs Keystone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cowyo
Feature-rich wiki webserver for minimalists
VS
Keystone
Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API
| Feature | Cowyo | Keystone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 968 | ★ 9,938 |
| First released | 2023 | 2013 |
| Replaces | — | Contentful, Strapi |
Why pick each one
Choose Cowyo if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Cowyo or Keystone better?
Neither is universally better. Keystone has the larger community, while Cowyo is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cowyo and Keystone free and open-source?
Yes. Cowyo is licensed under MIT and Keystone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cowyo and Keystone with Docker?
Cowyo: check the project docs for container support. Keystone: yes.