Coraza WAF vs Traefik Geoblock
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Coraza WAF
Open-source enterprise-grade web application firewall
VS
Traefik Geoblock
Geo-blocking middleware plugin for Traefik
| Feature | Coraza WAF | Traefik Geoblock |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,720 | ★ 314 |
| First released | 2021 | 2022 |
| Replaces | ModSecurity, Cloudflare WAF | Cloudflare WAF |
Why pick each one
Choose Coraza WAF if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (3.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Traefik Geoblock if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Coraza WAF or Traefik Geoblock better?
Neither is universally better. Coraza WAF has the larger community, while Traefik Geoblock is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Coraza WAF and Traefik Geoblock free and open-source?
Yes. Coraza WAF is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Traefik Geoblock under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Coraza WAF and Traefik Geoblock with Docker?
Coraza WAF: check the project docs for container support. Traefik Geoblock: yes.