Coraza WAF vs CrowdSec

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCoraza WAFCrowdSec
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectUnder-an-hour setup
Health score86 · Excellent95 · Excellent
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentsource, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 3,835★ 14,947
First released20212020
ReplacesModSecurity, Cloudflare WAFCloudflare WAF, Fail2ban

What are Coraza WAF and CrowdSec?

Coraza WAF

Coraza is an open-source, high-performance web application firewall library compatible with ModSecurity rules and the OWASP Core Rule Set. It is embedded into self-hosted proxies such as Caddy and Traefik.

  • ModSecurity-compatible
  • OWASP CRS support
  • High performance
  • Embeddable WAF

CrowdSec

CrowdSec is an open-source security engine that analyzes logs to detect and block malicious behavior, sharing threat signals across a community network. It is self-hosted with bouncers for proxies and firewalls.

  • Behavior-based detection
  • Community threat sharing
  • Many bouncers
  • Self-hostable

Read the full CrowdSec guide →

Coraza WAF vs CrowdSec: key differences

Both projects are written in Go. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Coraza WAF versus MIT for CrowdSec. Coraza WAF is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for CrowdSec. CrowdSec has the considerably larger community, at 14,947 GitHub stars versus 3,835. CrowdSec lists first-class Docker deployment; Coraza WAF does not.

Why pick each one

Choose Coraza WAF if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Coraza WAF details

Choose CrowdSec if…

  • Community threat intelligence
  • Modern Fail2ban successor
  • Bouncers for many platforms

Watch out for

  • Bouncers installed separately
  • Console features paid
CrowdSec details

Frequently asked questions

Is Coraza WAF or CrowdSec better?

Neither is universally better. CrowdSec has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Coraza WAF and CrowdSec free and open-source?

Yes. Coraza WAF is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CrowdSec under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Coraza WAF and CrowdSec with Docker?

Coraza WAF: check the project docs for container support. CrowdSec: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Coraza WAF or CrowdSec?

Coraza WAF has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for CrowdSec. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons