Continuwuity vs Tox
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Continuwuity
Community-maintained Rust Matrix homeserver
VS
Tox
Peer-to-peer encrypted messaging protocol and core
| Feature | Continuwuity | Tox |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 700 | ★ 2,670 |
| First released | 2024 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | Skype, Discord |
Why pick each one
Choose Continuwuity if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Tox if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Continuwuity or Tox better?
Neither is universally better. Tox has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Continuwuity and Tox free and open-source?
Yes. Continuwuity is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tox under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Continuwuity and Tox with Docker?
Continuwuity: yes. Tox: check the project docs for container support.