Bonfire vs Continuwuity

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBonfireContinuwuity
CategoryChat & CommunicationMatrix & XMPP
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageElixirRust
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 930★ 700
First released20202024
ReplacesFacebook Groups, DiscordSlack, Discord

Why pick each one

Choose Bonfire if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Elixir
Bonfire details

Choose Continuwuity if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Continuwuity details

Frequently asked questions

Is Bonfire or Continuwuity better?

Neither is universally better. Bonfire has the larger community, while Continuwuity is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Bonfire and Continuwuity free and open-source?

Yes. Bonfire is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Continuwuity under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Bonfire and Continuwuity with Docker?

Bonfire: yes. Continuwuity: yes.

Related comparisons