Continuwuity vs Element Web

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureContinuwuityElement Web
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageRustTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 700★ 13,495
First released20242016
ReplacesSlack, DiscordSlack, Discord, Microsoft Teams

What are Continuwuity and Element Web?

Continuwuity

Continuwuity is a community continuation of the conduwuit Matrix homeserver, written in Rust. It provides an efficient, federated Matrix server with a focus on stability and ongoing maintenance.

  • Drop-in conduwuit replacement
  • Active community maintenance
  • Efficient single binary
  • Full Matrix federation

Element Web

Element Web is the flagship Matrix client, providing a polished interface for chat, voice, and video over the Matrix protocol. It can be self-hosted alongside a homeserver for a fully owned communication stack.

  • Full-featured Matrix client
  • End-to-end encryption
  • Voice and video calls
  • Customizable branding

Read the full Element Web guide →

Continuwuity vs Element Web: key differences

Continuwuity is written in Rust, while Element Web is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Continuwuity versus AGPL-3.0 for Element Web. Element Web is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Continuwuity. Element Web is the more established project (first released 2016), while Continuwuity arrived in 2024. Element Web has the considerably larger community, at 13,495 GitHub stars versus 700.

Why pick each one

Choose Continuwuity if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Continuwuity details

Choose Element Web if…

  • Most mature Matrix client
  • Active development

Watch out for

  • Heavier than minimal clients
  • Best paired with own homeserver
Element Web details

Frequently asked questions

Is Continuwuity or Element Web better?

Element Web is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Continuwuity if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Continuwuity and Element Web free and open-source?

Yes. Continuwuity is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Element Web under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Continuwuity and Element Web with Docker?

Continuwuity: yes. Element Web: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Continuwuity or Element Web?

Element Web has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Continuwuity. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons