SHSelfHostIndex

Conserve Backup vs resticprofile

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CO Conserve Backup Robust, fast, deduplicating backup tool VS RE resticprofile Self-hosted backup orchestration for Restic repositories
FeatureConserve Backupresticprofile
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectRead-the-docs project
Health score58 · Fair77 · Good
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metalbinary
GitHub stars★ 278★ 1,425
First released20152019
ReplacesBackblazeBackblaze

What are Conserve Backup and resticprofile?

Conserve Backup

Conserve is a robust backup program written in Rust that creates deduplicated, versioned archives to local or remote storage. It emphasizes data safety and resumable operations.

  • Deduplicated archives
  • Versioned backups
  • Resumable operations
  • Data-safety focus

resticprofile

Resticprofile is a configuration profiles manager for Restic that simplifies running scheduled backups. It lets you define complex backup workflows in YAML, TOML, or JSON files.

  • Profile-based Restic config
  • Scheduling integration
  • Multiple config formats

Conserve Backup vs resticprofile: key differences

Conserve Backup is written in Rust, while resticprofile is built with Go. Licensing differs — GPL-2.0 for Conserve Backup versus GPL-3.0 for resticprofile. Resticprofile is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for Conserve Backup. Conserve Backup is the more established project (first released 2015), while resticprofile arrived in 2019. Resticprofile has the considerably larger community, at 1,425 GitHub stars versus 278.

Why pick each one

Choose Conserve Backup if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Conserve Backup details

Choose resticprofile if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
resticprofile details

Frequently asked questions

Is Conserve Backup or resticprofile better?

Neither is universally better. resticprofile has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Conserve Backup and resticprofile free and open-source?

Yes. Conserve Backup is licensed under GPL-2.0 and resticprofile under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Conserve Backup and resticprofile with Docker?

Conserve Backup: check the project docs for container support. resticprofile: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, Conserve Backup or resticprofile?

resticprofile has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for Conserve Backup. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons