Conduit vs Dendrite
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Conduit
Simple, fast and reliable Matrix homeserver in Rust
VS
Dendrite
Second-generation Matrix homeserver written in Go
| Feature | Conduit | Dendrite |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,200 | ★ 5,632 |
| First released | 2020 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | Slack, Discord |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Conduit or Dendrite better?
Neither is universally better. Dendrite has the larger community, while Conduit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Conduit and Dendrite free and open-source?
Yes. Conduit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Dendrite under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Conduit and Dendrite with Docker?
Conduit: yes. Dendrite: yes.