Commet vs Dendrite

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCommetDendrite
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectUnder-an-hour setup
StatusActively maintainedArchived
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageDartGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 100★ 5,625
First released20222017
ReplacesDiscord, SlackSlack, Discord

What are Commet and Dendrite?

Commet

Commet is a Matrix chat client that targets desktop and mobile from a single Flutter codebase. It aims for a familiar messaging experience with support for spaces and end-to-end encryption.

  • Flutter cross-platform client
  • Spaces support
  • End-to-end encryption
  • Desktop and mobile

Dendrite

Dendrite is a lightweight, efficient Matrix homeserver written in Go by the Matrix.org team. It is designed to be a more resource-efficient alternative to Synapse while remaining fully compatible with the Matrix protocol.

  • Lower memory footprint than Synapse
  • Federated Matrix protocol
  • End-to-end encryption support
  • Polylith and monolith deployment modes

Commet vs Dendrite: key differences

The biggest difference is maintenance: Dendrite's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Commet is actively maintained. Commet is written in Dart, while Dendrite is built with Go. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for Commet versus Apache-2.0 for Dendrite. Commet is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Dendrite. Dendrite is the more established project (first released 2017), while Commet arrived in 2022. Dendrite has the considerably larger community, at 5,625 GitHub stars versus 100. Dendrite lists first-class Docker deployment; Commet does not.

Why pick each one

Choose Commet if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Dart
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Commet details

Choose Dendrite if…

  • Much lighter than Synapse
  • Active development by Matrix.org

Watch out for

  • Some Synapse features still missing
  • Less battle-tested at large scale
Dendrite details

Frequently asked questions

Is Commet or Dendrite better?

Neither is universally better. Dendrite has the larger community, while Commet is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Commet and Dendrite free and open-source?

Yes. Commet is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Dendrite under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Commet and Dendrite with Docker?

Commet: check the project docs for container support. Dendrite: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Commet or Dendrite?

Commet has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Dendrite. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons