Conductor OSS vs Yacron
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Conductor OSS
Microservices and workflow orchestration engine
VS
Yacron
Modern YAML-configured cron replacement with alerting
| Feature | Conductor OSS | Yacron |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 32,066 | ★ 474 |
| First released | 2016 | 2017 |
| Replaces | AWS Step Functions, Camunda | cron |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Conductor OSS or Yacron better?
Neither is universally better. Conductor OSS has the larger community, while Yacron is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Conductor OSS and Yacron free and open-source?
Yes. Conductor OSS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Yacron under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Conductor OSS and Yacron with Docker?
Conductor OSS: yes. Yacron: yes.