SHSelfHostIndex

Conductor OSS vs ToolJet

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CO Conductor OSS Microservices and workflow orchestration engine VS TO ToolJet Low-code platform for building and automating business tools
FeatureConductor OSSToolJet
CategoryAutomation & WorkflowsAutomation & Workflows
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaJavaScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 32,066★ 38,306
First released20162021
ReplacesAWS Step Functions, CamundaRetool, Microsoft Power Apps

Why pick each one

Choose Conductor OSS if…

  • Battle-tested at scale
  • Language-agnostic workers
Conductor OSS details

Choose ToolJet if…

  • Rich connector library
  • Active development
ToolJet details

Frequently asked questions

Is Conductor OSS or ToolJet better?

ToolJet is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Conductor OSS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Conductor OSS and ToolJet free and open-source?

Yes. Conductor OSS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ToolJet under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Conductor OSS and ToolJet with Docker?

Conductor OSS: yes. ToolJet: yes.

Related comparisons