Conductor OSS vs Shoutrrr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Conductor OSS
Microservices and workflow orchestration engine
VS
Shoutrrr
Notification routing library and CLI for many services
| Feature | Conductor OSS | Shoutrrr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 32,066 | ★ 1,644 |
| First released | 2016 | 2019 |
| Replaces | AWS Step Functions, Camunda | Apprise |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Conductor OSS or Shoutrrr better?
Neither is universally better. Conductor OSS has the larger community, while Shoutrrr is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Conductor OSS and Shoutrrr free and open-source?
Yes. Conductor OSS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Shoutrrr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Conductor OSS and Shoutrrr with Docker?
Conductor OSS: yes. Shoutrrr: check the project docs for container support.