Conductor OSS vs Node-RED
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Conductor OSS
Microservices and workflow orchestration engine
VS
Node-RED
Flow-based programming for event-driven apps
| Feature | Conductor OSS | Node-RED |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 32,066 | ★ 23,501 |
| First released | 2016 | 2013 |
| Replaces | AWS Step Functions, Camunda | Zapier |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Conductor OSS or Node-RED better?
Neither is universally better. Conductor OSS has the larger community, while Node-RED is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Conductor OSS and Node-RED free and open-source?
Yes. Conductor OSS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Node-RED under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Conductor OSS and Node-RED with Docker?
Conductor OSS: yes. Node-RED: yes.