Conductor OSS vs Maxun
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Conductor OSS
Microservices and workflow orchestration engine
VS
Maxun
No-code web data extraction and scraping platform
| Feature | Conductor OSS | Maxun |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 32,066 | ★ 17,077 |
| First released | 2016 | 2024 |
| Replaces | AWS Step Functions, Camunda | Octoparse, Import.io |
Why pick each one
Choose Maxun if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 17.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Conductor OSS or Maxun better?
Neither is universally better. Conductor OSS has the larger community, while Maxun is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Conductor OSS and Maxun free and open-source?
Yes. Conductor OSS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Maxun under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Conductor OSS and Maxun with Docker?
Conductor OSS: yes. Maxun: yes.