Comentario vs SimpleX Chat
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Comentario
Privacy-friendly, self-hosted web comments engine
VS
SimpleX Chat
Private messenger without any user identifiers
| Feature | Comentario | SimpleX Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Haskell |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 700 | ★ 19,211 |
| First released | 2023 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Disqus | Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram |
Why pick each one
Choose Comentario if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Comentario or SimpleX Chat better?
Neither is universally better. SimpleX Chat has the larger community, while Comentario is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Comentario and SimpleX Chat free and open-source?
Yes. Comentario is licensed under MIT and SimpleX Chat under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Comentario and SimpleX Chat with Docker?
Comentario: yes. SimpleX Chat: yes.