Comentario vs Mouthful
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Comentario
Privacy-friendly, self-hosted web comments engine
VS
Mouthful
Lightweight self-hosted commenting engine
| Feature | Comentario | Mouthful |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Forums & Community |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 700 | ★ 774 |
| First released | 2023 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Disqus | Disqus |
Why pick each one
Choose Comentario if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Choose Mouthful if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Comentario or Mouthful better?
Neither is universally better. Mouthful has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Comentario and Mouthful free and open-source?
Yes. Comentario is licensed under MIT and Mouthful under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Comentario and Mouthful with Docker?
Comentario: yes. Mouthful: yes.