Comentario vs Talkyard
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Comentario
Privacy-friendly, self-hosted web comments engine
VS
Talkyard
Community forum combining discussion, chat and Q&A
| Feature | Comentario | Talkyard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Forums & Community |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 700 | ★ 1,811 |
| First released | 2023 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Disqus | Discourse, Disqus |
Why pick each one
Choose Comentario if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Comentario or Talkyard better?
Neither is universally better. Talkyard has the larger community, while Comentario is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Comentario and Talkyard free and open-source?
Yes. Comentario is licensed under MIT and Talkyard under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Comentario and Talkyard with Docker?
Comentario: yes. Talkyard: yes.