Remark42 vs Comentario
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Remark42
Privacy-focused lightweight commenting engine
VS
Comentario
Privacy-friendly, self-hosted web comments engine
| Feature | Remark42 | Comentario |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,574 | ★ 700 |
| First released | 2017 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Disqus | Disqus |
Why pick each one
Choose Comentario if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Remark42 or Comentario better?
Neither is universally better. Remark42 has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Remark42 and Comentario free and open-source?
Yes. Remark42 is licensed under MIT and Comentario under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Remark42 and Comentario with Docker?
Remark42: yes. Comentario: yes.