CKAN vs Yuno Archive
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CKAN
Make open data websites
VS
Yuno Archive
Extend functionnality of built-in yunoHost backup system
| Feature | CKAN | Yuno Archive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0-only |
| Language | Python | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,088 | ★ 6 |
| First released | 2026 | 2025 |
| Replaces | — | archivist, borg |
Why pick each one
Choose CKAN if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Yuno Archive if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Shell
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is CKAN or Yuno Archive better?
Neither is universally better. CKAN has the larger community, while Yuno Archive is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CKAN and Yuno Archive free and open-source?
Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Yuno Archive under AGPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CKAN and Yuno Archive with Docker?
CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Yuno Archive: check the project docs for container support.