CKAN vs pgBackWeb

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCKANpgBackWeb
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 5,088★ 2,615
First released20262024
ReplacesAWS RDS Backups

Why pick each one

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Choose pgBackWeb if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
pgBackWeb details

Frequently asked questions

Is CKAN or pgBackWeb better?

Neither is universally better. CKAN has the larger community, while pgBackWeb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are CKAN and pgBackWeb free and open-source?

Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pgBackWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CKAN and pgBackWeb with Docker?

CKAN: check the project docs for container support. pgBackWeb: yes.

Related comparisons