CKAN vs Timeshift

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCKANTimeshift
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePythonVala
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 5,088★ 4,219
First released20262014
ReplacesTime Machine, System Restore

Why pick each one

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Choose Timeshift if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (4.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Vala
Timeshift details

Frequently asked questions

Is CKAN or Timeshift better?

Neither is universally better. CKAN has the larger community, while Timeshift is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are CKAN and Timeshift free and open-source?

Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Timeshift under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CKAN and Timeshift with Docker?

CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Timeshift: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons