CKAN vs Stash by AppsCode
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CKAN
Make open data websites
VS
Stash by AppsCode
Kubernetes backup, restore, and disaster recovery operator
| Feature | CKAN | Stash by AppsCode |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,088 | ★ 1,423 |
| First released | 2026 | 2017 |
| Replaces | — | Kasten K10 |
Why pick each one
Choose CKAN if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Stash by AppsCode if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is CKAN or Stash by AppsCode better?
CKAN is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Stash by AppsCode if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are CKAN and Stash by AppsCode free and open-source?
Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Stash by AppsCode under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CKAN and Stash by AppsCode with Docker?
CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Stash by AppsCode: check the project docs for container support.