CKAN vs Restic Cron

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCKANRestic Cron
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguagePythonShell
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 5,088★ 702
First released20262019
ReplacesBackblaze

Why pick each one

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Choose Restic Cron if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Shell
Restic Cron details

Frequently asked questions

Is CKAN or Restic Cron better?

Neither is universally better. CKAN has the larger community, while Restic Cron is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are CKAN and Restic Cron free and open-source?

Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Restic Cron under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CKAN and Restic Cron with Docker?

CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Restic Cron: yes.

Related comparisons