CKAN vs File Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCKANFile Browser
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 5,088★ 35,800
First released20262017
ReplacesDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is CKAN or File Browser better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CKAN if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are CKAN and File Browser free and open-source?

Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and File Browser under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CKAN and File Browser with Docker?

CKAN: check the project docs for container support. File Browser: yes.

Related comparisons