CKAN vs Custom Backup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CKAN
Make open data websites
VS
Custom Backup
Backup extra paths not already managed by YunoHost backup feature
| Feature | CKAN | Custom Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0-only |
| Language | Python | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,088 | ★ 4 |
| First released | 2026 | 2024 |
| Replaces | — | — |
Why pick each one
Choose CKAN if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Custom Backup if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Shell
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is CKAN or Custom Backup better?
Neither is universally better. CKAN has the larger community, while Custom Backup is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CKAN and Custom Backup free and open-source?
Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Custom Backup under AGPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CKAN and Custom Backup with Docker?
CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Custom Backup: check the project docs for container support.