CiviCRM vs Rukovoditel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CiviCRM
CRM for nonprofits, NGOs, and advocacy groups
VS
Rukovoditel
Web-based project management and CRM builder
| Feature | CiviCRM | Rukovoditel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 762 | ★ 29 |
| First released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Salesforce, Blackbaud | Jira, Salesforce |
Why pick each one
Choose Rukovoditel if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is CiviCRM or Rukovoditel better?
Neither is universally better. CiviCRM has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are CiviCRM and Rukovoditel free and open-source?
Yes. CiviCRM is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Rukovoditel under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CiviCRM and Rukovoditel with Docker?
CiviCRM: check the project docs for container support. Rukovoditel: check the project docs for container support.