Corteza vs Rukovoditel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Corteza
Low-code platform with built-in CRM and case management
VS
Rukovoditel
Web-based project management and CRM builder
| Feature | Corteza | Rukovoditel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,125 | ★ 29 |
| First released | 2019 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Salesforce, Microsoft Power Apps | Jira, Salesforce |
Why pick each one
Choose Corteza if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
Choose Rukovoditel if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Corteza or Rukovoditel better?
Neither is universally better. Corteza has the larger community, while Rukovoditel is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Corteza and Rukovoditel free and open-source?
Yes. Corteza is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Rukovoditel under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Corteza and Rukovoditel with Docker?
Corteza: yes. Rukovoditel: check the project docs for container support.