Caddy vs Pi-hole

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCaddyPi-hole
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0EUPL-1.2
LanguageGoShell
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 74,748★ 60,247
First released20152026
ReplacesNginx, Apache

Why pick each one

Choose Caddy if…

  • Zero-config TLS
  • Easy to learn
Caddy details

Choose Pi-hole if…

  • Released under the EUPL-1.2 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 60.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Shell
Pi-hole details

Frequently asked questions

Is Caddy or Pi-hole better?

Caddy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pi-hole if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Caddy and Pi-hole free and open-source?

Yes. Caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pi-hole under EUPL-1.2. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Caddy and Pi-hole with Docker?

Caddy: yes. Pi-hole: yes.

Related comparisons