Caddy Docker Proxy vs Pi-hole
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Caddy Docker Proxy
Generate Caddy reverse proxy config from Docker labels
VS
Pi-hole
Blackhole for Internet advertisements with a GUI for management and
| Feature | Caddy Docker Proxy | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | EUPL-1.2 |
| Language | Go | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,606 | ★ 60,247 |
| First released | 2018 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Traefik | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Caddy Docker Proxy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.6k GitHub stars)
Choose Pi-hole if…
- Released under the EUPL-1.2 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 60.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Shell
Frequently asked questions
Is Caddy Docker Proxy or Pi-hole better?
Neither is universally better. Pi-hole has the larger community, while Caddy Docker Proxy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Caddy Docker Proxy and Pi-hole free and open-source?
Yes. Caddy Docker Proxy is licensed under MIT and Pi-hole under EUPL-1.2. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Caddy Docker Proxy and Pi-hole with Docker?
Caddy Docker Proxy: yes. Pi-hole: yes.