BunkerWeb vs Traefik
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BunkerWeb
Next-gen Web Application Firewall (WAF) that will protect your web
VS
Traefik
Cloud-native reverse proxy and load balancer
| Feature | BunkerWeb | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,784 | ★ 64,330 |
| First released | 2026 | 2015 |
| Replaces | — | HAProxy, AWS ELB |
Why pick each one
Choose BunkerWeb if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 10.8k GitHub stars
Choose Traefik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 64.3k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is BunkerWeb or Traefik better?
Neither is universally better. Traefik has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are BunkerWeb and Traefik free and open-source?
Yes. BunkerWeb is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Traefik under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BunkerWeb and Traefik with Docker?
BunkerWeb: yes. Traefik: yes.