AdGuard Home vs BunkerWeb

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAdGuard HomeBunkerWeb
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 35,977★ 10,784
First released20182026
ReplacesPi-hole, NextDNS

Why pick each one

Choose AdGuard Home if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 36k GitHub stars
AdGuard Home details

Choose BunkerWeb if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 10.8k GitHub stars
BunkerWeb details

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuard Home or BunkerWeb better?

AdGuard Home is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider BunkerWeb if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are AdGuard Home and BunkerWeb free and open-source?

Yes. AdGuard Home is licensed under GPL-3.0 and BunkerWeb under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run AdGuard Home and BunkerWeb with Docker?

AdGuard Home: yes. BunkerWeb: yes.

Related comparisons